1. iMovie
2. YouTube
3. Tripod, tracking, stabilization
4. Filtering, effects, saturation
5. Framing, image composition
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Documentaries
All three of these documentaries were very different in the
way they came across to the viewer, or what impression they gave. The video
about the basketball player caught my attention right away. Between the sounds
of a clock ticking, heartbeats, and fast breathing, I found myself feeling just
as nervous as Royce White did. To me, this documentary was a mix between a news
story and a fictional story. Sometimes you could tell there was a camera crew
there, like during the interviews, ext., but sometimes you could not. In the
video about the record collector, I wasn’t as invested in the story. The
documentary came across as purely an interview, and besides record playing in
the background, no sound effects or information really captured my interest.
The last video, about Korean netiquette, came across to me as a news special.
The crew was very visible in this documentary—the interviewer/producer was in
plain sight, asking questions and taking tours of the elementary school. It
seemed a lot like a “60 Minutes” show. The basketball documentary had the most
sound effects, and was separated by written information on the screen—we were
notified about what time of the day it was, what was going on, so it was pretty
easy to follow. This contributed to the “story” effect because it wasn’t just
an interview; it was cameras capturing the entire day in the life of a NBA
basketball contender. The captions in the record collecting video had a
different meaning—instead of giving the time of day, they told how much money
the collection was worth, how no one is buying it, ext. The only captions in
the Internet documentary were captions in English—which also gave it a news
broadcast feel.
Friday, February 22, 2013
The AcoUstiKats
The AcoUstiKats
If you ask any girl who went through Rush
week at the beginning of August, I’m sure most of them would remember it
vividly, the first night especially. After visiting all thirteen sorority houses,
girls (especially myself) were tired, and a little disoriented. For me, UK was
still a huge, new world, and the hot sun had exhausted me. Before we were
allowed to return to our dorms and crash for the night, we were led through
what seemed like a giant maze of buildings, to the large clock tower that is
basically the trademark of the University of Kentucky: Memorial Hall. We
approached the back of this picturesque building, where the ground concaved
into a crater, and stones outlined the seats. This was an outdoor theater.
Hundreds and hundreds of girls sat down in the grass, and a group of ten to
fifteen men stood up against the brick wall of the building, on a small
platform. All at once, they started singing, but there was no music playing
from a speaker. There were only the sounds of these men, singing in unison to
produce a sound that made my jaw drop.
The AcoUstiKats are an a cappella
ensemble, formed by some of the men on UK’s campus. These men create music,
using only their vocal chords, as they sing a vast array of modern and classic
songs. The members of the AcoUstiKats range from music majors, to fraternity
men, who practice twice a week in the Fine Arts Building, and occasionally perform
in front of the UK student body.
I had never been in the Fine Arts
Building on the University of Kentucky’s campus; I did not even know where it
was. I am a nursing student, so generally my classes are on the opposite side
of campus, or in Whitehall, where it seems like every student enrolled at the
University of Kentucky has at least one class a semester. Walking into the Fine
Arts building, I was pretty nervous, for I had no idea where I was going, or
even what I was looking for. I was instructed over email to go to ‘Room 6’,
which I assumed to be in the basement. I headed down a flight of stairs and
waited. Sitting on the floor, waiting outside Room 6, I
There were random bits of singing,
the classic warm ups I remember hearing from choir in my middle school years.
Some guys had extremely low voices, and some relatively high. Some were pacing,
some were sitting on the desks. Eventually, everyone sort of gravitated to the
piano, which was situated in the far right corner of the room. It was a pretty
basic piano, wooden, and painted black. I noticed that one man sat on the piano
bench and started giving instructions. He was leading the group through warm
ups, and I associated him as the leader of the AcoUstiKats. He didn’t look very
much older than the rest of the group; he might have been a senior or graduate
student. He was moving his hands a lot, making motions that the rest of the
group responded too, either changing their pitch, or the sound they were
making. I associated the guy behind the piano as the director. The atmosphere
was still casual: there was no standing in a formation, which you may think of
when you hear “choir”. Some stood close to the piano, behind it or right in
front of it. Some still sat on desks, and when it was not their turn to sing,
they were talking to their neighbor.
Finally, when the group finished
their warm ups, they each grabbed a binder, which I assumed was full of sheet
music, and started to sing a song. I don’t know the name of it, but I realized the
piano had stopped completely. The song was somber, and the different vocal
ranges of each guy created a mix of music that could stand alone, and
background music was not needed. One of the major things that made the vocals
of the AcoUstiKats stand out so much was their musical dynamics. The loud and
soft parts really made the song emotional. At one point, the director stopped
the group, and told them to “whisper sing this part”. The group did as they
were told and then at a new verse, they sang in much louder voices. This
definitely floored me, and the song was made much more interesting to listen
to. Most of the men were looking down into their binder as they sang, reading
the music, but some seemed to have their parts memorized. The president of SAE
was texting as he sang.
Another thing I noticed was how into the music these men got. Instead of
just standing ridged and singing, they were lively. There was foot stomping,
hand clapping. It was impossible to get bored while watching them perform,
because everyone looked so happy—they let the music envelope them. This is the
main thing that dominated my experience watching the AcoUstiKats. From start to
finish, the practice was filled with a light and casual atmosphere, that even
though there was immense talent in the room, it was clear that every member was
there to have fun. At the end of the hour, the practice concluded and as
everyone was gathering their stuff, three different guys came up to me and
thanked me for observing. The AcoUstiKats performed in a concert last week.
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Writing Workshop
I presented my paper to my peer reviewer, saying that I was aware that it needed some work. I was a little confused about whether or not we could include our opinions in this essay, because it was supposed to be objective. I told her that I went to an AcoUstiKats practice, and I had really just outlined the scene so far. I also told her that I felt like I might struggle with the length requirement. Then I handed her my computer.
As I read my neighbors essay, I kept in mind that she was also struggling with the length requirement. In a different color, I typed out where she should include more details: When she introduced some of her characters, the speakers at CSF, I suggested that she describe them more. She described their effects on the student audience, but I wanted her to elaborate on why she felt that gave off those effects. I told her to include what they looked like, what their personalities were like, how old they were, ext.
Since her essay was on CSF, I thought maybe one way to lengthen her essay would be to compare this Christian group with one she may be familiar with or heard about before, like in high school. This might give someone an idea about how different CSF is from traditional bible studies, and this could also reinforce her scene depiction.
Unlike most times I have had to do peer review, I actually though this was very helpful. My paper wasn't just read and not only grammar mistakes were pointed out. After class, I knew I had to add opinions and my experiences to the paper, which I wasnt sure if I should do or not before. I was told to add an experience from the beginning of the year and compare with with my observation from last week, which will strengthen my paper, and increase the length.
I think next time, encourage people to only look at one other paper, and devote the whole time to that paper. This makes your feedback much more well-though out, and it could really help someone out.
As I read my neighbors essay, I kept in mind that she was also struggling with the length requirement. In a different color, I typed out where she should include more details: When she introduced some of her characters, the speakers at CSF, I suggested that she describe them more. She described their effects on the student audience, but I wanted her to elaborate on why she felt that gave off those effects. I told her to include what they looked like, what their personalities were like, how old they were, ext.
Since her essay was on CSF, I thought maybe one way to lengthen her essay would be to compare this Christian group with one she may be familiar with or heard about before, like in high school. This might give someone an idea about how different CSF is from traditional bible studies, and this could also reinforce her scene depiction.
Unlike most times I have had to do peer review, I actually though this was very helpful. My paper wasn't just read and not only grammar mistakes were pointed out. After class, I knew I had to add opinions and my experiences to the paper, which I wasnt sure if I should do or not before. I was told to add an experience from the beginning of the year and compare with with my observation from last week, which will strengthen my paper, and increase the length.
I think next time, encourage people to only look at one other paper, and devote the whole time to that paper. This makes your feedback much more well-though out, and it could really help someone out.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Peer Review
To me, peer review is a way to help ourselves determine if
we are going in the right direction for our project. Someone reviewing your
paper, and you looking at multiple other papers, may make you see that you are
or are not fulfilling the purpose of the essay or project. I personally think
its helpful for me to compare my work to others because it tells me if I am
missing any key elements to my paper. As a writer, I not only want to know if
the structure of my essay is good, but also if I am missing the mark. I could’ve
misunderstood the topic, or not quite understand it, but if I get some feedback
on my work, I can tailor it to fit the guidelines we were given.
As a reviewer, I would need to review the other person’s
best work, because that way my reviews would be accurate. If they give me an
unfinished paper, or one they were planning on completely changing before the
due date of the final draft, my comments wouldn’t be very helpful.
I prefer groups of 2 or 3, only because that makes the peer
review process a little more focused. I think someone would be likely to give
better comments if they were focusing only on my paper, and not 4 others.
In terms of how long a peer review should take, it depends
on how long the essay is and how many your have to look at. If your looking at
someone’s best work, it shouldn’t take as long to pick out some details they
could improve. But if someone turns in a sloppy rough draft it could take a
long time to iron everything out so their essay is following the requirements.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Speech review
I think in terms of my voice and speaking, I did okay. At
the beginning I said “um” a little bit, but I also thought the whole thing was
casual enough and I didn’t loose my place at all, or just stop mid sentence.
This is probably because I was talking about myself, and since I knew the topics
I needed to cover, I just went with the flow. My biggest flaw was probably the
fact that I somehow refused to make eye contact, or even look at the audience.
I noticed I looked back at the projection screen a lot, and when I looked at
the audience, I quickly looked down, which accentuated my nervous look. And my
hands were fidgeting with my notecards, which drew attention to them. Even
though I told myself not to before hand, I still managed to cross my legs and
rock back and forth and that didn’t look very professional. I wish I had talked
about my career earlier in the speech, because I used the ending of that as my
conclusion, when I really had a better ending at the end of my entertainment
part. I kind of trailed off at the end too. I really thing the presentation of
my speech was the worst part of it, and the content was good, but even though I
was comfortable when I practiced, getting up in front of people usually causes
me to break eye contact with the audience, and that really subtracts from what
I am saying.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Ethos:
·
Normally I stand ridged and cross my legs, I
need to walk around a little bit, move, to make it seem like I am more
comfortable
·
Make eye contact with EVERYONE
·
Practice enough so if I loose my place I can
just move on smoothly and not panic
Pathos:
·
I’m not looking to make these sad stories, but I
want people to see how my life has changed in the past 6-7 months
·
Specific stories
·
Try to make them unique
Logos:
·
Outline:
1.
Introduction
a.
Thesis: Being the youngest in my family, I have
always been able to look up to someone else. I haven’t felt real responsibility
for myself until I moved away from home, and had to start over. I feel as if I
have a new life, but parts of it are more underdeveloped than others.
2.
Body:
a.
Career:
i. Student
life in a different state
ii. Story
of rush week—most difficult week I’ve been through
iii. Being
in a sorority/pledge class
iv. Not
100% sure what I want to do after college
b.
Family:
i. Youngest
child
ii. Shy
iii. Looking
up to my sister (nursing)
iv. Always
had people to look up to (I watched their careers, looked at what they did,
never really had to think about doing something different)
v. Only
one to move out of state to go to college
vi. Proving
myself to my family
vii. My
maid of honor speech to my sister
viii.
Image: Picture I have of me as a little girl
with my sister and all of her friends (to show how I kind of tagged along my
whole life as the youngest, and now I don’t have that comfort zone, I am my own
person)
c.
Entertainment:
i. All
of my friends went to different schools—I knew no one coming to UK
ii. The
social aspect of this life is just as important to me as the academics—you cant
go anywhere alone
iii. Having
a “family” of friends (sisters in my sorority)
3.
Conclusion:
a.
Summary/ tie it all together
b.
Why I stayed here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)